It is our company that can provide you with special and individual service which includes our CIMAPRO19-CS3-1 preparation quiz and good after-sale services. Our experts will check whether there is an update every day, so you needn’t worry about the accuracy of CIMAPRO19-CS3-1 Study Materials. If there is an update system, we will send them to the customer automatically. As is known to all, our CIMAPRO19-CS3-1 simulating materials are high pass-rate in this field, that's why we are so famous.
Topic | Details |
---|---|
Topic 1 |
|
Topic 2 |
|
Topic 3 |
|
Topic 4 |
|
Topic 5 |
|
>> CIMAPRO19-CS3-1 Top Dumps <<
You may have gone through a lot of exams. Now if you go to the exam again, will you feel anxious? CIMAPRO19-CS3-1 study guide can help you solve this problem. When you are sure that you really need to obtain an internationally certified CIMAPRO19-CS3-1 certificate, please select our CIMAPRO19-CS3-1 exam questions. You must also realize that you really need to improve your strength. Our company has been developing in this field for many years.
NEW QUESTION # 26
The formal merger with Darrell has been negotiated and the legal formalities have been completed. The two company management teams are working on the integration of the two businesses.
You receive an email from Peter Sorchi, the Chief Executive of the merged company:
From: Peter Sorchi, Chief Executive Officer
To: Senior Finance Manager
Subject: Integration of IT and treasury
Hi,
I need you to advise me on a couple of matters. The attached press clipping shows how sensitive this is.
We need to integrate the IT and treasury functions of the former Wodd and Darrell. I thought that it would be a simple matter of identifying the common ground and slimming down both companies' departments to cover the new entity, but I have the heads of both IT and treasury from each company arguing that their approaches are better for the merged group and that they should take the lead.
Wodd's Treasurer claims to be an expert in natural hedging of currency risks and Darrell's argues that her department was highly successful because it makes excellent use of derivatives for hedging. Both agree only on the fact that they cannot work together. I am afraid that I have to agree with them on that and the Board will have the difficult decision of choosing between them.
I have the opposite problem with the IT function. The two Heads of IT are excited to be able to combine their databases and to develop their respective interests in Big Dat a. They claim that we should retain all of the professional staff in both departments and possibly even expand the merged IT Department beyond that. Given the rationalisation in all of our other functions, I do not think that we can agree to that, but I would hate to throw away a worthwhile opportunity.
Please give me your thoughts on the following:
* What approach to hedging is more likely to meet our needs: natural hedging or heavy use of derivatives?
* Ignoring hedging, what other factors should we consider in deciding between the two treasurers?
* Are the two heads of IT likely to be correct in arguing that we need to retain all existing IT staff in order to exploit synergies in data, particularly opportunities to leverage Big Data?
* What would the challenges be in motivating them to reduce their joint staffing levels and how might we deal with these?
Peter
Answer:
Explanation:
Complete your answer and submit
NEW QUESTION # 27
It is now three days since the start of the oil spillage crisis.
You have received the following email from William Seaton, Director of Finance:
From: William Seaton, Director of Finance
To: Finance Manager
Subject: Crisis management issues
Hi,
A quick update on the latest developments.
We have brought Block Associates in to lead the operations on dealing with the oil spill. It has assigned one of its leading consultants to take charge of this for us. We have paid Block Associates an annual retainer for many years, but we have never actually had to call on its services because we have been able to contain any environmental problems using our own resources.
Using Block Associates is going to be expensive. It insists on being free to bring in whatever equipment and personnel are required to resolve matters and to charge that on the basis of cost plus 25%. Our annual retainer is simply the cost of ensuring that it will respond on this basis if required.
We have had some murmurings of discontent already because our own engineers and geologists have made significant progress in identifying the cause of the spillage and they believe that they are capable of bringing it to a successful conclusion. They have suggested that it would be both quicker and cheaper to leave them in charge, while retaining the option to bring in Block Associates at a later date if they fail.
* Firstly, what factors should we take into account in deciding whether to leave our own experts in charge of this operation rather than using Block Associates?
* Secondly, how should we manage our relationship with Block Associates if we decide that it should be used?
* Thirdly, two things: The Board is concerned that Slide's engineers and geologists have already become disillusioned by the decision to consider calling in Block Associates. We cannot afford to lose their commitment or to see them decide to leave Slide in the longer term. I need you to provide me with some ideas as to how we can motivate them to give their best performance for the duration of this crisis AND to inspire them to remain in Slide's employment after the crisis has been resolved.
William
Answer:
Explanation:
Complete your answer and submit
NEW QUESTION # 28
Newsweb
Protesters block bulldozers
Attempts by Wodd to harvest some of the hardwood trees from their newly acquired Bravadorian forest suffered a further setback yesterday.
Wodd's bulldozers have been unable to make any headway in clearing the site for the company's first logging base because environmental groups from several countries have descended on the Bravadorian jungle to protest the proposed destruction of the forest and the associated harvesting of many rare hardwood trees. Protestors have chained themselves to trees and to heavy equipment, making it impossible to commence the clearance operations.
Wodd's problems have been compounded by the recent discovery that a tribe of forest dwellers has lived in the forest for many generations, making little or no contact with the outside world in the process. The tribe is effectively nomadic, moving from one part of the forest to another, surviving by hunting game and gathering edible vegetation and relocating when food starts to become scarce. The environmental protestors claim that Wodd's activities will make it impossible for this tribe to continue with its traditional way of life.
Wodd claims to adhere to The Forestry Stewardship Council of Marland's ten principles, which include the assurance that "The legal and customary rights of indigenous peoples to own, use and manage their lands, territories, and resources shall be recognized and respected." Reference Material:
Answer:
Explanation:
Complete your answer and submit
NEW QUESTION # 29
A month has passed since you submitted the report requested by William Seaton, Director of Finance on the Board's proposals.
You have received the following email:
From: William Seaton, Director of Finance
To: Finance Manager
Subject: Shale oil
Hi,
One of the geologists made a presentation to the Board, proposing that we investigate the extraction of shale oil deposits. I have attached the slides that were used as the basis for this presentation.
I need you to work on a response to this document:
* Firstly, what risks do you envisage in our entry to the shale oil business?
* Secondly, what do you regard as the key factors that we should consider when deciding on proceeding with this proposal? Please justify your selection.
* Thirdly, what factors should we take into account when deciding on which country or countries to commence this side of the business?
* Finally, what are the challenges in creating a team of technical staff to lead our efforts in this area?
William
The presentation slides can be found by clicking on the Reference Materials button.
Answer:
Explanation:
Complete your answer and submit
NEW QUESTION # 30
The Director of Finance, William Seaton, has stopped you in the corridor:
"Your report was really helpful, but the Board is still considering the implications of that email from Jan Archibald at Fouce Oil. I need to make a more detailed report to the Board and I would like you to draft it for me.
I know that we have owned and operated oil wells in the past, but that has always been with the intention of finding a buyer who is prepared to pay a realistic price. We have chosen never to think about the implications of keeping wells.
I need a report from you that covers the following issues:
* The key political risks of retaining our interest in these oil wells, with particular emphasis on high consequence, high likelihood risks.
* A suitable response to each of your political risks.
* An overview of how changes in the global economy and the demand for oil could affect the decision to proceed.
* The challenges associated with putting together a management team to take charge of the production side of this proposed new strategy.
I realise that this is a lot to ask of you, but I need you to move quickly because of the interest from our biggest shareholder."
Answer:
Explanation:
Complete your answer and submit
NEW QUESTION # 31
......
The proper answer to your questions is Real4Prep. When studying for the Strategic Case Study Exam (CIMAPRO19-CS3-1) certification exam, Real4Prep is one of the most helpful resources. Real4Prep guarantees success on the first try by providing you with actual Strategic Case Study Exam (CIMAPRO19-CS3-1) exam questions in PDF, desktop practice exam software, and a web-based practice exam.
CIMAPRO19-CS3-1 Reliable Practice Questions: https://www.real4prep.com/CIMAPRO19-CS3-1-exam.html